A Nation, Founded on LIES, Part Three

Hello, and welcome to Conway's wonderful world of the politically incorrect, which makes paid pretenders like Bill Maher look like the controlled, propagandizing puppet and simpering kike dwarf that he is. That arrogant, annoying, know-it-all motherfucker is a real piece of work; just look at his history.

That noted, I intend to easily prove before all who read that the Third Amendment of the United States Constitution is nothing but a LIE, using several examples that will follow shortly. I shall do this by interpreting historical events, along with employing the same cunning, rhetorical legerdemain that politicians and shysters use to "prove" that "money can commit a crime" or that "corporations are persons". The first cannot "do" anything, considering that money is an inanimate object, and the second is not a "person", never was, nor ever will be, as a corporation is a man-created, intangible entity without life. In today's bizarre world, where logic and rational thinking no longer applies, that doesn't matter - like in Orwell's 1984, we have "Newspeak" which consists of variably defined words and phrases, dependent on the situation. The disgusting whoremonger, William Jefferson Clinton, proved that, by rhetorically stating that it all depends on what the meaning of the word "is" is.

The amoral, elected pirates running this moribund, miasmic balkanized dump will stop at nothing to further their aims, even if it comes to using "law enforcement" personnel as an ersatz army to facilitate their duly approved agenda of total control. I will use various cited articles along with the State and Federal Government's employment of militarized, jackbooted pigs to enforce their will as proof that the Third Amendment is nothing but a lie, by using the "William J. Clinton" method of "variable meaning".

If you have read my earlier polemics, you already know that I have no use for politicians or their armed, badged privateers, and that I subscribe to a dialectical materialistic view of world history - which, quite simply, states that economic forces have driven and shaped events, and that the elitist class of talking apes who most effectively control capital, in whatever form, are the ones who reign over and control lesser talking apes, a lower class called "the masses", via exploitation, in the form of work, taxes, et cetera. Marx may have been wrong with the idea of communism, but he was right on the money with regard to what he dubbed "class warfare". Such is self-evident, considering the privileged SWINE that run the United States, so without further delay, I shall present the Third Amendment.

THE THIRD AMENDMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:

No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

I will now take this patently idiotic Amendment apart as follows.

1) "No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house,"

2) "without the consent of the Owner,"

3) "nor in time of war,"

4) "but in a manner prescribed by law."

Madison really fucked up on this one - the Third Amendment is not only meaningless on the surface, but contradictory when the third and fourth parts are contrasted against the first and second parts, together and separately.

Concentrating on the first part, with reference to the second part, it basically states that no member of the Armed Forces "in a time of peace" can be housed in any domicile without the consent of the owner of said domicile. Very nice, on the surface, but when looking deeper, anyone with even half a brain can see that the statement is a bunch of shit written for credulous fools. 

Why?

Well, at the time of ratification, the United States didn't have property taxes, so you did own your property then, sort of, in a way, I guess, unlike today, where "property ownership" has been clandestinely and effectively abolished, with the slack-jawed American drones never even noticing that their "property rights" had vanished. Really, try not paying your property taxes, and see just how long you continue to "own" your "property". Nor did we have Nixon's draconian EPA, so, citing the preceding "laws", i.e., property taxes and Nixon's EPA edict, you don't own your motherfucking house now anyway, and you never did, at least since 1970, fancy, calligraphic, notarized "deeds" notwithstanding. Property ownership is another cunning LIE - get over it, serf. You are a tenant in common, at best - and the all-powerful SOVEREIGN STATE OWNS your property, period, and "permits" you to "use it" - nothing more. That's the way it is - look it up; consult any current law dictionary for proof of this blunt assertion.

The third part of the Third Amendment, relying on the second part, implies that the "owner" must give consent as well in "time of war" whatever that actually is, but it does not state that directly, and all of the earlier Madisonian sophistry of the Third Amendment is in fact negated by the fourth part, "in a manner to be prescribed by law". Quite literally, regardless of how this absolute farce of an Amendment is written, any "legal" body, house, senate, tribunal, or even a MOB of self-appointed barbarians can meet, pass an ordinance with regard to YOUR property, and LEGALLY jam troops in whatever form down your fucking throat, whether you like it or not. Oh well, so much for "rights" - you don't have them, and you never did. Further, employing an even simpler method, all a judge has to do is to approve a "warrant" with regard to your property, using the Fourth Amendment AGAINST YOU, based on the "sworn testimony" of a crooked pig, and then duly sanctioned, armed freebooters can break into your home, legally, and even kill you, your family, or a group of those allied to your cause.

I'm sure that some legalistic rhetorician would say that I'm "taking it out of context" or that "I don't understand what is being related", or other such nonsense - how the fuck else can it be interpreted - it's what James Madison WROTE! Here is some Goebbelsian propaganda stating that the Third Amendment doesn't apply to the States at all, and that jackbooted pigs breaking into your house, armed with automatic weapons and the like aren't "soldiers" - what the fuck are they then, Jehovah's Witnesses?

http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2013/07/brief-history-third-amendment-cases

Yeah, what a case of rhetorical, legalistic hair-splitting, after all folks, the Fourth Amendment wasn't formally recognized as "applying to the States" - until 1961!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mapp_v._Ohio

Here's another one - stating that the Third Amendment has not been legally "incorporated" against State governments. In other words - the Third Amendment is a fucking LIE, just like all of the other laughable Amendments in that glorified piece of toilet paper called the Constitution. If your "rights" get in the way of "government" - your rights are GONE.

http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/07/07/a-misguided-third-amendment-case-in-nevada/#.UyQeUz9dWSo

You see - the pigs can break into your house without a warrant and arrest you, the OWNER, for not letting them quarter theirselves in your home. Read the next links:

https://www.courthousenews.com/2013/07/03/59061.htm

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/07/08/family-booted-from-home-for-police-detail-suing-with-rare-use-third-amendment/

Now, one would think that since the Bill of Rights was ratified by the States, that those rights would be honored by those States admitted to the Union - nope, through cunning, legalistic machination, only "certain rights" apply, most of the time in some cases, or only sometimes in most cases, or maybe not at all in a few cases - incredible, isn't it? Guess what, it's all a bunch of BULLSHIT  - you don't have any fucking rights, and you never did, wake up and realize it. The silly "civics" classes that were jammed down your throat as a kid were just as useless and inapplicable to reality as the propagandistic lunacy of attending "Sunday School" on weekends.

Moving on, the time has come to list modern historical precedents, and employ rhetorical legerdemain to facilitate the establishment of conclusive PROOF that the Third Amendment is nothing but a goddamned, motherfucking LIE, authored by a very naive, intelligent man, or a very cunning, intelligent man, or a simple idiot, disguised as an intelligent man. I will cite three separate events, which are graphically illustrated for the reader below.

1) Mr. Jose Guerena, an American spic, Arizonan "citizen", ex Marine, man without a criminal record, and murder victim was slaughtered by pigs, who entered his domicile unannounced, mowed him down with a fusillade of bullets from automatic weapons, and then tramped around in his home for several hours afterward, "looking for drugs" - while only finding a picture of "Jesus Malverde, Patron Saint of Drug Dealers", according to the drug-dealing criminals that run this place.

Okay - what does any of that have to do with the Third Amendment?

A lot, read carefully - pigs are employees of the STATE, a sovereign body, they are paramilitaristic in form and action; they are paid by the state to carry out their agenda, i.e., "enforcing the law" - with an ersatz army of ARMED MEN. When the pigs forced their way into the home of Mr. Guerena, on 5 May 2011, they did so under the guise of a "warrant", issued under the cunning pretext of duly sworn LIES. Authorized by the state under the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, they commandeered and "quartered" themselves within Mr. Guerena's home, after they murdered him. It's as simple as that; after the smoke from the automatic weapons settled, and the house or "compound" secured, the corpse of Mr. Guerena was hauled away from his home to the morgue in a fucking meat-wagon - without being charged with anything, not that it would have made any difference by then. I suppose Mr. Guerena's "soul" floated up to Jesus or something after he was blown away by pigs, but that's another story. A few years passed, and the survivors, i.e., Mrs. Vanessa Guerena and her two children by her dead husband, Jose, received 3.4 million dollars in "compensation" from the employers of the pigs, Pima County, et al, without admitting any wrongdoing - and with none of the pigs that murdered him fined, or charged with anything.

Here, read selected articles regarding the slaughter of Mr. Guerena for yourself - I didn't write the fucking things - then look further on the Internet for verification, you'll find it:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jose_Guerena_shooting

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/26/jose-guerena_n_3988658.html

Go ahead - rationalize and dismiss the above articles as "biased" - there are many other articles, other than the two offered for perusal, which report the same events with regard to Mr Guerena and family, in the same fashion, and relating the same dreadful results to the reader. Rationalize it further, and plead that the "poor police" made an honest "mistake" - that still doesn't make Jose Guerena any less DEAD, does it?

2) Mr. Randall Weaver, a honky, used to be a Christian, but he woke up - now he is an atheist, like me, and for goddamned good reasons. You see, several members of his family were mercilessly slaughtered in the State of Idaho by armed, jackbooted thugs with automatic weapons employed by the Federal Government, thanks to a "bench warrant", issued for a "failure to appear" charge. This charge was related to an earlier charge by Federal pigs, regarding a downright trivial modification of common shotguns. You see, the shotguns were sawed off three-eighths of an inch (9.5 mm) below the legal limit - how utterly unforgivable, wouldn't you say?

If you wish, read the following articles; they will familiarize you with the events of 21 August 1992 and subsequent events, lasting through 31 August 1992.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randy_Weaver

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruby_Ridge

http://www.crimelibrary.com/gangsters_outlaws/cops_others/randy_weaver/1.html

http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/weaver/randytestimony.html

http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/weaver/weaveraccount.html

http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/weaver/harristestimony.html

Go ahead, call the above links "biased" too, if you like - then find other "not so biased" sites, which will relate the same events and sworn testimonies to you in the same fashion.

Continuing, for this "terrible crime" of "failure to appear", agents of United States Marshals Service and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, which are two types of Federal pig, were deployed to the residence of Randall Weaver, a mountaintop property known as "Ruby Ridge". The USMS and the FBI are paramilitary units, employed and ARMED by the Federal Government. Comprising yet another ersatz army, USMS and the FBI stormed Weaver's property and home, murdered members of his family, and then quartered theirselves on his supposed "property", searching for "evidence", while Weaver's wife and son were hauled away in meat-wagons to the local morgue, having been slaughtered by the Federal pigs in the name of freedom. 

Judging from the above incident, I guess the Third Amendment doesn't apply to the Federal Government, either - who the fuck does it apply to - invading Martians?

After years of legal wrangling, Mr Weaver was, for the most part, absolved of any wrongdoing (see the above articles), and the amoral criminals running this bankrupt nation "compensated" he and his surviving children with the sum of 3.1 million dollars, again without admitting any wrongdoing on their part. The only good thing that came out of the entire ordeal is that one arrogant, jackbooted thug, a US Marshal named William Francis Degan, Jr., was sent to his grave by a man named Kevin Harris, where he belongs and rots forever.

Below is a revolting "memorial", actually an atrocious, sanitized propaganda piece which could have been written by Paul Joseph Goebbels, complete with "reflections", devoted to the dead pig, for your reference:

http://www.odmp.org/officer/370-deputy-marshal-william-francis-degan-jr

Nauseating, isn't it? Notice there is absolutely no mention of Randall Weaver by name, or his murdered son Samuel, who also "ended his watch" on 21 August 1992. Incidentally, Samuel Weaver was shot in his BACK by these "brave policemen". Samuel's mother, Vicki, wife of Randall, "ended her watch" on the following day, thanks to another sadistic, jackbooted gook pig, Lon Horiuchi, who shot her in the head while she was holding her infant daughter Elisheba in her arms. Isn't that wonderful?

Here's information regarding the "hero", Lon Horiuchi:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lon_Horiuchi

3) Mr. Vernon Wayne Howell, AKA Mr. David Koresh, another whitey, was a deluded religious fanatic who led a group of loony Christian misfits who called themselves the "Branch Davidians". Odd, yes, but the First Amendment of the United States Constitution plainly says that you can worship any fucking thing you want, from Avantis to zebras and all in between, in any way that you want, as long as no one else is hurt in the process, you know, like conducting "human sacrifices" or whatever. Yes, the First Amendment has already been conclusively proven by your friend Conway as an utter crock of shit, but I'm simply citing it for reference, and the sake of argument.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Koresh

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waco_siege

In typical fashion, David Koresh and his devoted, brainwashed minions were accused of anything and everything imaginable by the media, from drug dealing and running a clandestine methamphetamine factory, to stockpiling weapons, to child molestation. Sounds familiar, doesn't it - a hackneyed Goebbelsian trick used to discredit those individuals considered a threat to the status quo. The ATF and the media employed such cunning tactics and mendaciousness to make Koresh and his ilk appear as dire threats to the public, and the rest is history, with charred bodies everywhere. Anyway, the only provable charge is that these certifiable lunatics were creating automatic rifles from semi-automatic rifles, for whatever reason, namely, AR-15s and semi-auto AKMs, but, considering that no one had yet been killed as the result of such activities, one would think that simply arresting Mr. Koresh and others of his group at other locations, away from the Branch Davidian "compound" would have been a much better idea. Further, the fact that the Second Amendment is also a crock of shit comes into play here, as the "National Firearms Act of 1934", effectively banning automatic firearms for the general populace, proves the Second Amendment as fraudulent sophistry for credulous drones.

Making a long story short, arrogant FBI and ATF pigs and their porcine allies attempted to serve search and arrest warrants upon Koresh and his coterie of armed, sycophantic loonies, in the most aggressive fashion possible, which predictably resulted in four jackbooted pigs and six religious fanatics meeting their ends on 28 February, 1993. Thus started a 51 day siege, where the pigs blared loud music and aimed brilliant halogen spotlights on the "compound", callously disregarding any "kids" attempting to sleep therein.

Analyzing the situation, perhaps the Branch Davidians were justified in stockpiling weapons and creating automatic weapons to defend themselves, considering the occurrences of 28 February 1993, when they were attacked by jackbooted thugs using automatic weapons, and especially considering what occurred later, on 19 April 1993, when the "compound" was totally destroyed by dyke Reno and the "authorities" - in the name of freedom, or apple pie, or the flag, or whatever the hell those pricks use to justify their positions. This draconian action ended the siege, yes, but also resulted in vicious old Uncle Sam exacting his pound of flesh like a veritable Shylock, in the form of the incineration of 76 people, including seventeen "kids", and their leader, loony Koresh, Messiah of the damned.

That view, of course, is contested by the vicious, elitist criminals running this society, who state that the Branch Davidians were responsible for starting the fire that caused the carnage, judge for yourself -  all one needs to do is to view the following footage:

http://www.nbcuniversalarchives.com/nbcuni/clip/51A02181_002.do

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKlsThwd75w

Yes, the second video is supposedly "doctored" and therefore "discredited" by the authorities - what would YOU do or say in their position? Further, comparing identical parts of both videos - which one IS the "doctored video"? How can anyone tell - supposedly, the latter was taken from a VHS video, whereas the former came from who knows where - and where is the original Beta-cam or U-Matic tape? 

No one knows. Strange - isn't it?

Anyway, after the fire died down, the paramilitaristic pigs moved in, ostensibly in the name of "securing the perimeter"and "quartered theirselves" on the destroyed remains of the Branch Davidian's property, without their, or their heirs, permission, having used a "warrant" to facilitate such a quartering. 

Oh well, so much for the Third Amendment, effortlessly destroyed by your friend Conway as the mendacious sophistry that it is. In summary, noted above are three separate occurrences of government sanctioned police brutality and invasion of property, not to mention a veritable shitload of blatant violations of other supposed "inalienable rights" of the people -  the "rights" of Jose Guerena, the "rights" of Randall Weaver and his family, and the "rights" of David Koresh and his followers. 

As for Jose Guerena, he was completely innocent of any wrongdoing, period; the survivors of the unwarranted attack on his household receiving 3.4 million dollars in "compensation" for his slaughter, with the perpetrators of his demise admitting "no wrongdoing" in the entire affair. I wager that is due to his killers having "more rights" than Mr. Guerena ever did - like something out of Orwell's Animal Farm - no wonder they are called "pigs".

Regarding Randall Weaver, after being shot by the pig Lon Horiuchi, and having his wife and son slaughtered, he was convicted of a trifling charge in an obvious attempt to thwart the ability of Mr. Weaver to file a lawsuit. It didn't work; he and his family received 3.1 million dollars in "compensation" from the government, which stated that their duly sworn officers committed no "wrongdoing" in the killings of Vicki and Sammy Weaver. 

Mr. Kevin Harris, the man accused of killing the pig William "Bill" Degan - was charged with murder, along with a pile of other charges thrown in for good measure. He was tried and afterward acquitted of all charges by a jury of his peers. Then the Federal Government, pissed off that Harris had walked, attempted to try him on the same charges, which were thrown out due to the "double jeopardy" clause contained in the Fifth Amendment. Lucking out on that one, Harris went on to collect $380,000 in "compensation" from the authorities, whose jackbooted swine had attempted to kill him during the siege.

As for Koresh and his Branch Davidians, their own stupidity contributed to the siege and the stupidity of the ATF, FBI and other authorities exacerbated it, which culminated in a hellish conflagration of debatable origin that killed 76 people, 17 of them children. All of these people, including the "kids" supposedly had "rights" under the Constitution, but when arrogant, testosterone laden, self-convinced, armed pigs, backed by a tyrannical government, decide to "move in", your "rights" go out the fucking window. In the aftermath, several survivors of the siege were convicted of various charges, some justified and others unjustified; as a result, few lawsuits of note have been filed, mainly because most of those who could have filed them are DEAD, and the one notable lawsuit filed for 675 million dollars in damages by the survivors was summarily dismissed in 2000 by the same judge who presided over the criminal trials. Yes, that is a fact - such would be laughable if it wasn't the grotesque parody of justice that it is. You see, you don't even have the right to sue those bastards for damages, even if your loved ones were killed and your property destroyed, due to you being a serf and they being the Sovereign. Get over it, that's the way it is, always has been, and it's the way it will stay.

Well, serf, isn't your laughable "freedom" wonderful? It gets you fucking DEAD today, regardless of any silly goddamn "Constitutional Amendments", which are much better for wiping assholes than for ever bothering to read. There are many other examples of police terrorism, old niggers being shot in their own homes, grandmothers mowed down by pigs on erroneous warrants, unarmed drivers being shot to death at the side of a road - the data is there is you have the guts read it.

http://www.policemisconduct.net/

http://policecrimes.com/

http://listverse.com/2012/11/07/top-10-cases-of-police-brutality/

Now, employing the Hegelian dialectic, we will take the Third Amendment of the United States Constitution, which, in the simplest of terms, claims that we have the "right" to refuse the quartering of soldiers in our domiciles, as a thesis. That statement can then be juxtaposed against the evidence presented above, as an antithesis, from which a synthesis can be deduced.

Synthesis: The Third Amendment of the United States Constitution is a goddamned, motherfucking LIE.

Go ahead, try to prove me wrong; the utter hypocrisy of this place makes me want to vomit.

Regards,

Conway

A Nation, Founded on LIES, Part Two

Well, I wager my preceding post woke someone up - hits went up like a bat out of hell, courtesy of my good friends at the NSA or the CIA, or maybe even the FBI. I wager someone, somewhere, doesn't like what I have to say at all, even though there isn't one thing they can do about it, legally. Searching for anything that could be construed as a threat to anyone, they finally closed the page in bitter disappointment, angrily conceding that your friend Conway, whose true identity they already know, chooses his words very, very carefully. 

That aside, speculating further, perhaps they'll send the IRS after me for daring to tell the truth about this cadaverous farce of a nation, or maybe they'll elect to use the Secret Service, in a pathetic attempt at intimidation, sternly accusing me of "disrespecting" that disgusting, inept, narcissistic nigger jackanapes Obama, sitting on his goddamned brain in the White House.

Disrespect? 

Are you fucking kidding me - respect is EARNED, and Obama has not earned mine. Hell, I'd call that banana-lipped mulatto a jungle bunny to his goddamned face if I ever encountered him, on national television, mind you. I have more respect for blood-bloated bedbugs than I ever could for a clown like Barack Obama - or his retarded predecessor, empty-eyed honky George W. Bush. Both are excrement under my feet, unworthy of respect or acknowledgement given to mangy felines. 

H. L. Mencken said it best: “As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.” 

Empty-eyes and the jackanapes are absolute PROOF of that assertion.

Further, according to the First Amendment, whether it is a lie or not, I am allowed to disrespect anyone that I want to, but that's another story. Refer to the preceding post for verification of that assertion. 

Exploring another scenario, our esteemed betters may even employ a jackbooted gestapo pig to simply pull me over in the name of the law on a dark country road while driving my old, rusty junker home from the local convenience store - for the felonious crime of a bad tag light, and then dutifully blow my brains out all over the well-worn and split Naugahyde front bench seat. Afterward, the duly sworn servant of the people will plant an old, rusty rim-fire .32 on my cooling cadaver, in the name of freedom, god, George Washington, and Civil Rights. The following morning, Goebbelsian headlines will shrilly state that I was a terrorist, or a drug dealer, or a child molester, or that I didn't love Jesus, or whatever it will take to paint kindly old Conway as as the most despicable fucking creature to have ever lived since Gaius Caligula, Emperor of the Romans. I won't give a shit what they will say, as I'll no longer exist, except as a rotting carcass of deanimated meat sitting in a local morgue.

I have yet to see one comment refuting my position that the First Amendment is a lie, though an anonymous commenter stated that they envied my vocabulary, and that Zip Code 12345 was based in Schenectady, New York at the General Electric home office. GE is a company founded by Thomas Edison, another atheist who invented a whole shitload of devices, like light bulbs, DC power distribution, phonographs, and the Kinetograph, an early motion picture camera. I found the Zip Code information to be an interesting piece of trivia, and thanked him or her for their input. The picture at the top of this essay is a nod to the anonymous poster.

That said, this vicious polemical essay will be devoted to exposing the Second Amendment for the LIE that it is, using American history and current events to SHOW the reader that it as nothing but mendacious sophistry used to dupe credulous, mentally-challenged drones, masquerading as the American citizenry.

Reiterating history, Mr. James Madison, hypocrite, wealthy, slave owning elitist, and Fourth President of the United States was the brilliant author of the ridiculous document called the "Bill of Rights", which contain the First through Tenth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States of America. It is my intention to prove conclusively at the end of each essay that all of them are lies, cunningly crafted as a smokescreen to mesmerize feckless idiots, seducing the credulous into believing that they have "inalienable rights" given to them by some sort of god. Considering there is no proof that god exists, it is safe to assume that god does not exist and never did exist. Expounding the preceding statement, it is evident that our "rights" come from the clever, talking APE called man, and are easily negated by the clever, talking APE called man, by using FORCE, either covertly, through legislation, or overtly, by employing physical persuasion. Oh well, so much for god and rights of man, I guess. Cynically summarizing, is plainly obvious that the American citizenry possessing firearms is a grave threat and very present danger to the evolving Federal and State fascist tyrannies. Therefore, the Second Amendment must, and will be negated by those in power to enable the tyranny to progress further. 

For example, while perusing the Internet, I have noticed that a group of evident government paid shills are plainly stating that everyone should give up their guns, due to the Federal Government possessing tanks and other superior weapons, with which they will subjugate the people by force. Psychologically, such remarks are tactical; they are a threat, and are being employed by those in power in order to intimidate and demoralize an already alienated population into feeling hopeless. Such clumsy tactics won't work, and have been tried before, across history. What individuals with such ignorant worldviews do not realize is that governments exist at the WHIM of the CITIZENRY, not vice versa. People with nothing left to lose and everything to gain are not cowered by the threats of those individuals they consider intractable enemies - a cornered rat will fight a fucking lion, even with no hope of survival, and a million rats will defeat and devour one. That is the key; one determined citizen can be defeated easily, a thousand determined citizens, not so easily; with a million determined citizens - success and "regime change" of whatever type is virtually certain. 

Citing our blood-drenched history as proof, the ultimate goal of the cunning, talking APE called man is for a select group of greedy apes to gain POWER and control over the masses, using any means, so the masses can be exploited by those in power - to facilitate the pursuance of whatever perceived want or need that is desired by the controlling group, which has always been wealth, in varying forms - be it goats, gold, silver, slaves, ships, whores, wildebeests, or whatever is considered "valuable" at the time. Those in power can and will use anything to justify their lofty and exalted positions - invoking their perceived intelligence, the need for public safety; "science", as it is so-called today, e.g., global warming and its ugly sister, climate change, or by even invoking god - when they are truly desperate and have no recourse, other than death. All of the above, contrived measures are very effective at duping dronelike clods, for the most part, until the shit hits the fan, then, all bets are off. Regardless of temporary success, given enough time, coupled with oppression of the masses, the masses revolt, a vicious bloodbath ensues and the victors establish a new government, which immediately sets out to accomplish the very same task that the vanquished regime pursued - to have power over and to control the masses, and to exploit them economically, for the exact same reasons.

Yes, the above could be considered a "Marxist" worldview - sue me.

Anyway, the supposed worldviews of those gangsters presently running any nation doesn't matter at all, whether they be capitalists, fascists, or communists, as long as the dronelike masses have something to believe in, like the easily convinced, dogmatic, gullible fools that they are. Autocratic statism and devotion to such is replacing religion; Stalin's Soviet Union, Hitler's Nazi Germany, Mao's Communist China, and the current United States of America are proof of that assertion. The only discernible differences in the above four entities is that the United States is promoting "friendly" fascism - wanton tyranny disguised as freedom, complete with a with a cynical motherfucking "happy face" plastered over wanton autocracy. Other than that there is no difference in execution of goals - subjugating and forcing the populace to adopt a particular worldview, to facilitate the agenda of the elitist vermin controlling and exploiting the masses. Then, when the masses being exploited finally wake up - things change - FAST, like an unstoppable wildfire. 

That's all it takes, dear reader; the communist revolutionary Vladimir Lenin and his Bolsheviks proved that nearly a century ago; just ask that exiled Trudovik Aleksandr Kerensky - after the Czar was deposed, he offered continuing war for the people, Lenin offered peace for a weary population. The battleship Aurora backed Lenin up, using her GUNS in the October Revolution. Yet another communist, Chairman Mao, said it quite succinctly: "All political power grows out of the barrel of a GUN", and the worried, tyrannical, fascist despots running the United States today will resort to any kind of subterfuge to disarm and subjugate the citizenry, out of their very REAL fear of becoming the next Louis XVI, Czar Nicholas, or Nicolae Ceausescu. The amoral gangsters running this joint don't want you to know these things - they make hundreds of thousands of dollars per annum running this moribund nation, while they LAUGH at YOU - how much do you make, and then PAY to them for your REAL labors, in TAXES, so they can live like KINGS over YOU?

Capitalism, communism - have you actually NOTICED - what difference is there? Vladimir Putin is ferried around in chauffeured, bulletproof ZIL limousines, while Barack Obama is ferried around in chauffeured, bulletproof Cadillac limousines - and YOU, a supposed "free citizen of the United States" drive around in some fucking old, common rusty junker Chevy or Nissan with 100,000 miles on it, wondering if the goddamned oil pump or alternator is going to take a shit and cost you a pile of money that you do not have. Hey, credit cards work, and you'd better make sure your insurance and tags are current too, or the pigs will collar you as a "criminal" and cost you even more bucks. Politicians and their ilk live in palatial mansions staffed by servants, you live in a mortgaged dump, at best, owned by a bank, or you rent an apartment owned by those like them; they have the best of everything, and pretty capped teeth, too - you have yellow dentures or rotten teeth at best. Funny thing is - YOU paid for their palatial mansions and their capped teeth, with YOUR taxes, that they BILKED from YOU, via their fellow gangsters at the IRS. If you don't pay their "protection" in the form of TAXES - they steal what you own and then put you in prison so you can get fucked in your ass, in the name of, justice,  Jesus or whatever - what real difference is there between they and the MAFIA? They LAUGH at YOU, and me, like the parasitical vermin they are - but they are morbidly AFRAID, as the populace has GUNS. They must take them away, at any cost, including your death.

One of my very favorite movies is "Nicholas and Alexandra", from 1971 - especially the end, where the entire pampered "Royal Family" is mercilessly slaughtered by the vengeful Bolsheviks - along with the wonderful YouTube videos of Ceausescu and his cunt wife Elena being shot to death on Christmas Day, 1989. I actually laughed at them; I never had a better "Christmas present", ever - seeing that despotic asshole and his wife coldly knocked off with Kalashnikovs as one would dispatch a rabid dog. Call me sadistic if you like, but I truly enjoy seeing elitists like Louis XVI, Nicholas Romanov or that bastard Ceausescu get exactly what they deserve; I make no apologies for it and I never will. If I live long enough I plan to enjoy watching videos depicting such wonderful occurrences in the good old USA, playing over YouTube for my viewing pleasure, while smiling at the carnage like a vindictive demon.

Enough lengthy diatribe for now - in continuation of this series over the arbitrary date of 2014, CE, I shall also prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that most other amendments adopted after the Fourteenth Amendment were passed to ERODE and DESTROY freedom, with other selected amendments being either patently obtuse, e.g., Amendment XVIII, or put forth in a cynical attempt to thwart revolt, e,g,. Amendment XXVI, adopted during the Vietnam war.

Below, the text of the Second Amendment, verbatim:

THE SECOND AMENDMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

Analysis of the Second Amendment:

Quite plainly, the citizens of the United States ARE the militia, and those citizens of the United States have the RIGHT to keep weapons (e.g., clubs, knives, swords, crossbows, ball bats and specifically, firearms) within their homes and on their persons, and citizens of the United States have the RIGHT to bear weapons (e.g., clubs, knives, swords, crossbows, ball bats and specifically, firearms) if necessary, i.e., USE (e.g., clubs, knives, swords crossbows, ball bats and specifically firearms) for target practice, hunting, self-defense and even to defend themselves from governmental tyranny. Further, according to the Second Amendment, Congress MAY NOT promulgate laws that limit or "infringe" the exercise of a citizen's right to keep and bear arms, period. For the remainder of this essay, I shall only specifically refer to firearms, as they are the very core of the Second Amendment.

At least that's what the Second Amendment SAYS, but it is, after all, only sophistry written on a page of parchment, it cannot enforce itself, unlike those well-protected, well-armed individuals who make up a government, who can, will and do enforce their will, for good or ill, upon the hapless citizenry. 

The Founding Fathers and others agree with the above interpretation of the Second Amendment, complete, verbatim citations would take up a lot of my time and needless space, so I shall post convenient links for the reader's perusal:

http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/George_Washington

http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/j/james_madison.html

http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/t/thomas_jefferson.html

http://thomas.loc.gov/home/histdox/fed_29.html

http://www.madisonbrigade.com/j_adams.htm

http://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/63859.James_Madison

http://www.mgoa.com/GunRightsQuotes-1.htm

http://www.buckeyefirearms.org/gun-quotations-founding-fathers

http://www.godseesyou.com/2nd_amendment_quotes.html

http://www.eskimo.com/~bpentium/articles/guns.html

http://www.beararms.us/FamousQuotes.php

http://www.quotations.com/gun_control.htm

I submit the above links are enough to prove the intention of the Founding Fathers with regard to individual citizens possessing firearms for personal use - for hunting, for self-defense, and for prevention of governmental tyranny. Some may not believe my assertion, and may choose to split hairs, arrogantly stating that some of the sites are "biased" or "fringe" sites - who the fuck cares - the quotations of the Founding Fathers are their very words, they are accurate, and can be found elsewhere on the Internet - simply look their quotes up yourself on other sites if you doubt my veracity.

Now, using all of the above as a premise, I shall show the reader that the Second Amendment is a LIE. I will accomplish this task using several dialectical steps, as follows:

1) Rights of any type are not inherent, nor do they come from a god, they are given to the citizens by the governing body, and can be easily modified, or even taken away by the governing body if deemed necessary or expedient, by using "laws", or force.

Expounding on that premise, and illustrating the unabashed hypocrisy of the Founders of this nation; at the time of the Founding Fathers, niggers had no rights at all; they weren't citizens of anywhere and they were even viewed as animals, by said hypocrites. Then, after the Civil War, they were given rights by those in power who won the war. You see, it wasn't any god that endowed niggers with rights, nor did their rights magically appear from the ethers - they were GIVEN their rights by other PEOPLE, specifically, Northern whiteys, on a whim, to arrogantly rub the defeated Southerner's noses in it, so to speak.

Was it "right" or "good" to do any of the above? Who the fuck knows - morality and ethics are completely arbitrary, dependent on the given situation - might makes right, and that's all that counts, or ever did count, in reality, regardless of any rhetorical sophistry stating otherwise.

2) Rights of any type are not "inalienable", considering that martial law "suspends" our supposed "god given rights" - just ask folks like Abraham Lincoln, and the Territorial Governor of Hawaii, Joseph Poindexter. "Rights" vanished like a fart in the wind - with the proclamations of MEN, that is, Mr. Lincoln and Mr. Poindexter.

3) Several US states and localities during the 1800's attempted to interfere with gun ownership and the use thereof, promulgating "concealed weapons" laws, but most of those laws were simply a nuisance. However, the fact that they succeeded in passing such legislation exemplifies the Second Amendment for what it IS -  just another cunning lie for credulous drones to believe in. Such legalistic legerdemain was only the beginning of the "slippery slope" that is leading to outright CONFISCATION of legally owned firearms in Connecticut - a state supposedly governed by the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_laws_in_Connecticut

http://benswann.com/connecticut-sends-letter-to-unregistered-gun-owners-to-surrender-firearms/

So much for your risible, non-existent "right" to "keep and bear" arms, citizen, or more aptly, subject - I maintain that the Second Amendment IS a fucking LIE.

4) With the Federal Government usurping more power originally delegated to the People or the States (the Ninth and Tenth Amendments) in the Twentieth Century, the Congress of the United States of America has, since 1934, blatantly infringed on the rights of American citizens to keep and bear arms, starting with the "National Firearms Act", signed into law by the cripple, in both body and mind, Franklin Delano Roosevelt. The "Gun Control Act" of 1968 followed, signed into law by the crooked, amoral megalomaniac Lyndon Baines Johnson, with the "Brady Handgun Violence Act" of 1993, and the "Federal Assault Weapons Ban" of 1994, signed into law by the mendacious whoremonger, William Jefferson Clinton. 

Links to each "ACT" are provided below:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Firearms_Act

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_Control_Act_of_1968

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brady_Act

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Assault_Weapons_Ban

Although I despise both Democrats and Republicans equally, as both are little more than elected gangsters, it is rather odd that all of the above laws were promoted, passed and promulgated by DEMOCRATS, the vociferous, self-proclaimed "defenders of the Constitution". Oh well, hypocrisy and mendaciousness are nothing new - just look at the corrupt Roman Senate at the time of Cicero or the utterly disgusting Greek "Democratic" Senate that condemned Socrates to DEATH. Incidentally, the same goes for the major wars of the Twentieth Century, i.e., World Wars One and Two; they were prosecuted by DEMOCRATS, together with their presiding over lesser wars like Korea and Vietnam, but that's another story altogether. Yes, the current conflicts we are in, e.g., Afghanistan, or have recently exited from, i.e., Iraq, are the products of Republican Administrations, both prosecuted with the overwhelming support of Democrats, mind you; that only proves there is no difference at all between the Democrat or Republican parties of today.

5) Another convenient link, illustrating the concept of the "slippery slope" is now presented for the reader to peruse, further showing before all who read that the Second Amendment is a LIE.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_politics_in_the_United_States

6) Current Goebbelsian propaganda, created by cunning authors to dupe the young into a contrived interpretation of the Second Amendment, supported by the United States Federal Government, as is illustrated by the links below:

http://truthstreammedia.com/ap-history-textbook-that-altered-2nd-amendment-also-lied-about-4th/

http://www.dailypaul.com/299365/high-school-ap-history-book-rewrites-the-2nd-amendment

http://redalertpolitics.com/2013/09/19/high-school-textbook-rewriting-the-second-amendment-distributed-to-hundreds-of-schools-nationwide/

https://www.google.com/search?q=altered+second+amendment+textbook&oq=altered+second+amendment+textbook&aqs=chrome..69i57.12499j0j8&sourceid=chrome&espv=210&es_sm=122&ie=UTF-8

Here is an op-ed, from the New York Times, supporting the Goebbelsian rewrite of the Second Amendment:

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/05/opinion/rewrite-the-second-amendment.html?_r=0

Lastly, here, for the reader, is an article of blatant, biased, contrived Goebbelsian LIES about the Second Amendment, with opposing comments destroying the author, Thom Hartmann's, stance:

http://truth-out.org/opinion/item/13786-the-founding-fathers-vs-the-gun-nuts

Analysis completed, I submit, by citing and comparing the above theses, derived from eight disparate premises, and with only the written words of the Second Amendment as an opposing antithesis, that a credible synthesis can be quickly deduced, with minimal effort:

The Second Amendment is CONCLUSIVELY PROVEN as the goddamned LIE that it is.

I again invite anyone, I even dare you, from drooling drone to Constitutional Scholar, to PROVE my terse assertion wrong, by using FACTS, backed up with supporting evidence in the form of accredited, or at least provable, citations. The onus is upon you to prove me wrong, and, if such is proven, I shall publicly concede defeat at your hands, and post notations of such defeat in a later essay.

Just wait until I prove the idiotic Third Amendment as a goddamned, motherfucking LIE - that's coming up next. I will succeed in doing that by employing the same legalistic cunning and legerdemain that lawyers use in "proving" that "money can commit a crime", or that "corporations are persons", which the former cannot and the latter is not, in any universe that is populated by those considered SANE. Both are logical fallacies and absurd contrivances that would be laughed at by those like Socrates, Plato and Aristotle, but what the hell - man is the measure of all things, including definition - just ask Protagoras, or that old, silly kike Noam Chomsky.

Regards,

Conway

A Nation, Founded on LIES, Part One

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Conway's Holiday Update

Conway here - Merry fucking Christmas, and Happy New Year. If you don't like me wishing you a merry fucking Christmas, fuck off.

I've finally gotten back into the spirit of creating new articles, after a long hiatus; trading stocks and tending to other things in life take precedent over something as silly as composing cathartic diatribes that no one reads.

That horseshit out of the way, a review of the major stories of the past year is in order, launching my latest vitriolic attack on the arrogant, aloof, elitist, apelike creatures charged with administering this dying nation. Let's see - jackanapes Obama was re-elected, as I predicted, George Zimmerman was acquitted, as I predicted, and the United States has sunk even further into abject insanity, as I predicted. Kermit Gosnell was convicted by a jury of his peers - which - curiously enough, I did not predict; it surprised the living hell out of me that the murderous moolie was convicted, but, considering the evidence, anything other than a conviction was impossible. The cowardly, greedy, arrogant jig agreed to accept a term of "life in prison", rather than a death sentence, which he deserves - hopefully he will receive justice at the hands of musclebound jailhouse queers who have an attraction to old, freckle-faced niggers.

The only good thing that happened in 2013 are the revelations made by Edward Snowden, the NSA contractor who decided to expose the United States for what it actually is, before the entire world: an arrogant, moribund, two-faced, hypocritical, bankrupt, decadent, totalitarian Orwellian police state run by gangsters - disguised as a "republic", and dubbed a "democracy" by politicians, brain-dead drones, and the government controlled media. I just love being told by those cocksuckers as to how fucking free I am - I have the freedom to suck dicks and fuck other men in their asses, and slaughter unborn children by the truckload, and I have the freedom to be as fucking obnoxious as I want  to be - but only if I am a queer, or support the wholesale killing of of unwanted brats by some horny cunt who couldn't use birth control or keep her fucking legs closed. Strange that I am not free to dissent from supporting the above, or to associate with whom I please, or to support others who are allied with my subjective worldview.

I have been told that on various threads I bothered to respond to, posting my disagreement with the herd, sans the colorful language that I use here. When commenting on threads related to articles that I read, I do not use foul language nor racial epithets, nor do I employ ad-hominems; however, I have been banned by such sites as Politico and Topix, along with the Huffington Post, LA Times and CBS, for daring to disagree. I submit for all who read this diatribe: the Soviet Union was freer than this goddamned insane asylum could ever be.

I humbly present this short diatribe as a prelude to further vicious polemical essays that will be posted in 2014.

Regards,

Conway

A Future YOU Asked For

I had originally intended to post this screed in the summer of 2013, but sheer boredom with the tedium of blogging has prevented it until now - I only am posting it for continuity, and in preparation for future polemical essays.

Greetings fellow talking apes, your friend Conway has finally returned after a long hiatus, having composed more jarring, foul mouthed, politically incorrect vitriol that the reader loves, or perhaps hates with an unbridled passion. Either way, I don't give a shit what anyone thinks of what I write; you are reading what I think, for good or ill. What anyone else thinks is not very important to me, if at all important - what I THINK is important, and fuck everyone else. Really, I must draw a line somewhere; those individuals who do not appreciate my scrawlings may close the fucking page and move to something more in accordance with their tastes; I won't care.

Unlike most other blogs, which are unfortunately a microcosm of this moribund society at large, the reader is allowed to disagree with me, and to tell me so by responding to my vicious polemical essays, though at the risk of me pointing out fallacies in the disagreement, or if the reader simply wishes to call me a motherfucker, they risk me calling them a motherfucker, right back.

In disgust I deleted the essay I had intended to post in October 2012 as the elections went exactly as I predicted they would go, without any endorsements from me, mind you. I cannot endorse criminals; I view all of our leaders as meretricious scoundrels, regardless of party, and I refuse to vote for those I consider my enemies, and enemies of the people of the United States. In the months having passed since then, we have witnessed jackanapes Obama's glorious re-election by a society of brain-dead drones, with a little help from the dead electorate too - voting in rigged elections across the country. Now that the inept eight-ball has been re-elected, it seems he has gone into overdrive in his determined frenzy to destroy what is left of this nation, employing draconian assaults on the constitutional rights of the American citizenry.

Where to start regarding the Head Gangster's scandals and crimes - well, we have Benghazi, we have the AP wiretapping incident, we have the Holder/Rosen affair and we have the IRS singling out conservative groups, to name a few, not to mention Fast and Furious, together with another dozen or so criminal fuck-ups that occurred before this aloof, obtuse, obnoxious nigger was re-elected in an election that gives new meaning to the word FRAUD. As a side, we also have a young man named Edward Snowden, a government contractor who has proven that the Federal Government and its alphabet soup subsidiaries like the NSA and CIA are little more than a coterie of paranoid, obsessive-compulsive gangsters that have no regard at all for the privacy or rights of US citizens.

For Benghazi alone the smoothtalking moolie should be collared, impeached, convicted and thrown out of office, and afterward prosecuted as a war criminal and jailed for the rest of his life. It seems that condescending bastard can get away with ANYTHING - what hold does this half-breed with no history have over his fellow crooks and the American citizenry?

What the hell has happened to this nation? The American people have always been ignorant, unsophisticated fools for the most part, but the paralyzing apathy that has permeated this dump rivals that of the Roman Empire in the fifth century. For decades the young have received "educations" that have left them even more ignorant  than when they first entered school; some of these "graduates" cannot even find the fucking United States on a goddamn map of the planet. They have been specially conditioned by those in power to be ignorant, parroting drones, inculcated to believe anything they are told by the government and its mouthpiece, the media. They have been brainwashed into believing, with a religious fervor, that they have "rights" that were never even remotely touched upon in the Constitution, and are further mesmerized into disdaining the rights that they were guaranteed to possess by the Bill of Rights.

An insidious cabal of power-mad criminals have facilitated this vexing phenomenon; going back at least as far as the early 20th Century, that set out in a deliberate fashion to destroy the very fabric of Western culture. I submit they have succeeded, considering what this nation has become: a vicious, angry herd of left or right leaning, self-absorbed, alienated, self-convinced, dogmatic maniacs - hell bent on destroying each other at any cost.

I, for one, sincerely hope that they do destroy themselves, to the last man, and hope that I live to enjoy and relish in the destruction of this blossoming evil empire.

That said, The United States of America, for having turned its collective back on the Constitution, now deserves anything and everything it gets - from anyone.

Regards,

Conway